Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. Weidler

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1903No. S.F. No. 2778PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

Action to recover certain personal property, or the value thereof, alleged to have been wrongfully taken by defendant, as constable, under an attachment against persons other than plaintiff, and damages for the wrongful taking, etc. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, fixing the value of the property at five hundred and sixty dollars, and awarding damages in the additional sum of five hundred dollars. Defendant moved for a new trial on nearly all the statutory grounds. The court announced that it would grant a new trial on the ground of excessive damages, unless plaintiff would consent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp. v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Estate of BainbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Noxon v. RemingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API