Read v. Buffum
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The plaintiff, in paragraph 3 of his amended complaint, alleged-the assignment of the account in question, its non-payment, and his- ownership thereof.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The plaintiff, in paragraph 3 of his amended complaint, alleged-the assignment of the account in question, its non-payment, and his- ownership thereof. These allegations the defendant denied as follows: “Defendant alleges that he has no information or belief sufficient to enable him to answer the allegations .set forth in paragraph 3 of said amended complaint, and for that reason defendant denies each and every and all of said allegations in said paragraph contained.”…
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The plaintiff sues as the assignee of the California Powder Works, a corporation, for money alleged to be due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by said corporation to the defendant. The defendant in his answer denies the allegation of his indebtedness to said corporation, and denies the assignment of said alleged indebtedness to the plaintiff.
And as a further and separate answer, and as a defense to said action, alleges:—
“That at all the times stated in said amended complaint the defendant was, and is now, a resident of the territory of Arizona, and has not at any of said…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Cockerell v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Mulcahy v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnston v. Milwaukee & Wyoming Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.