Raphael Weill & Co. v. Crittenden
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. The judgment was rendered on the pleadings.
It is averred in the complaint, which is verified, that—1. Plaintiff is and at the time mentioned in the complaint was a corporation organized, etc., under the laws of this state, and having its principal place of business in San Francisco; 2. “That within two years last past, in the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendant, at his special instance and request, goods, wares, and merchandise of the value of four hundred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Read v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bank of Shasta v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Grangers' Business Ass'n v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- St. Mary's Hospital v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.