Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. City of Altus, OK.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 11, 2006No. 04-6062PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs are employees of the City of Altus, Oklahoma (City). They appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing all their claims against the City, the City Administrator, and the Street Commissioner (collectively referred to as Defendants). All claims arise out of the City’s English-only policy for its employees. Asserting claims of both disparate-impact and disparate-treatment, Plaintiffs contend that the English-only policy discriminates against them on the basis of race and national origin in violation of Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Tabor v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Metzler v. Federal Home Loan BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Teigen v. RenfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Carpenter v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Montes v. Vail Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API