Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Boeing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2006No. Nos. 04-3334, 04-3350, 04-3351, 04-602PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s disposition of the employment-discrimination claims of female employees at the Boeing Company’s Wichita, Kansas, facility. They have sought to bring class-action claims alleging several unlawful employment practices under both disparate-impact and disparate-treatment theories of discrimination. The two subclasses relevant to this appeal are a subclass of hourly female workers (the Hourly Subclass) and a subclass of salaried female workers (the Salaried Subclass). Before us now are both (1) the district court’s summary judgment…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Schneider v. City of Grand Junction Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Tabor v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Turner v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. North Hudson Regional Fire & RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.