Legal Opinion
Tabor v. Hilti, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 15, 2013No. 11-5131PublishedCited by 315 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHESON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Roñica Tabor and Dacia Gray (collectively “Plaintiffs”) worked as inside sales representatives at Hilti, Inc., and Hilti of North America, Inc. (collectively “Hilti”). After being denied promotions to Account Manager (outside sales) positions, they each filed individual claims for gender discrimination under Title VII and moved to certify a class of all female inside sales representatives at Hilti who were denied similar promotions.
The district court refused to certify the class and granted summary judgment for Hilti on all claims. Exercising jurisdiction…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by315 opinions
- Schneider v. City of Grand Junction Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Dewitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Cillo v. City of Greenwood VillageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Conroy v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Jones v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
310 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.