Legal Opinion
Teigen v. Renfrow
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2007No. 06-1283PublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
David Teigen and Timothy Bennett (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Nolin Renfrow, former Director of Prisons for the Colorado Department of Corrections (“DOC”); Madline SaBell, former Director of the Human Resource Office of the DOC; and Joe Ortiz, Executive Director of the DOC (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs also named Ortiz and Gary Golder, Acting Director of Prisons of the DOC, in their official capacities, as defendants in the action. In their complaint, Plaintiffs alleged Defendants acted in…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Dias v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Burnett v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Christy Sports, LLC v. Deer Valley Resort Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.