Legal Opinion

Kaull v. Blacker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1920No. 22,546PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs, millers at Glen Elder, sought to recover from the defendants, dealers in flour at Kansas City, damages that had been sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of the refusal of the defendants to accept and pay for flour that they had contracted to purchase from the plaintiffs. The defendants, on a counterclaim, recovered judgment for damages caused by the fact that the flour delivered would not make bread. The plaintiffs appeal.

1. They contend that the court committed error in refusing to admit certain evidence offered by them.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lukens v. FreiundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Craver v. HornburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. G. B. Shaw & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Nixa Canning Co. v. Lehmann-Higginson Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Challis v. HartloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API