Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The action is to recover damages for personal injuries resulting to the plaintiff from the partial consumption of a certain tobacco known and advertised under the name of “ Velvet ” which was found, on smoking, to contain mutilated fragments of a dead mouse. The tobacco was manufactured and sold by the defendant Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the manufacturer). The defendant United Cigar Stores Company of America (hereinafter referred to as the retailer) was engaged in the business of selling smoking tobacco, and, in the course of its business, sold this package…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Howard & Ryckman v. HoeyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Victoria St. Pierre Lartigue v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Liggett and Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Adams v. Peter Tramontin Motor SalesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Delk v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Torrance v. Durisol, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1956
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.