Swift & Co. v. Aydlett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOonNOR, J.
The note sued upon in this action is identical in form with the note upon which plaintiffs sought to recover of defendant in Swift v. Etheridge, 190 N. C., 162. The defense in that action was the same as that pleaded in this action. The defense in each action is absence or failure of consideration for the note executed by defendant and payable to the order of plaintiff.
With respect to negotiable instruments, it is provided by statute, in .this State, that “absence or failure of consideration is matter of defense as against any person not a holder in due course, and partial failure of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Poovey v. International Sugar Feed No. Two Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Bunch v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Brantley v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1858
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.