Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Swift Co. v. . Aydlett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1926PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1ConcurrenceStacy, C.J.

Civil action on note for $220.50, payable to order of plaintiffs, Swift Company, dated 13 May, 1922, and due on or before 1 September, 1922. Said note was executed by defendant for value received in fertilizers and contains the following clause:

"The consideration of this note is commercial fertilizers sold to the undersigned without any warranty as to results from its use or otherwise. Said fertilizers have been inspected, tagged and branded under and in accordance with the laws of this State."

Defendant, in his answer, admits the execution of the note sued on, and in defense of plaintiffs'…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Poovey v. International Sugar Feed No. Two Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Hampton Guano Co. v. Hill Live-Stock Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Bunch v. WeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Brantley v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1858

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API