Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1961No. 42,268 and 42,339, 42,268 and 42,338PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sgtiroeder, J.:

These actions were instituted by the insured plaintiff for the recovery of monthly benefits alleged to be payable under certain health and accident policies issued by the defendant companies. Benefits under these policies were payable in the event of total and continuous disability resulting from accidental injury. After commencement of the actions the defendants paid the plaintiff all accrued monthly payments, and the plaintiff stipulated that such payment was in full settlement and agreed to dismiss the actions with prejudice. The…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Berry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Southland Life Ins. Co. v. NortonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Higgins v. Cardinal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Casson v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Koch, Administratrix v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Service v. Pyramid Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API