Legal Opinion

Craver v. Hornburg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Ellsworth District Court. Action brought by Charles F. Craver and Alonzo Steelet partners as Craver & Steele, against Hornburg, on a promissory note. Trial at the February Term, 1881, of the district court, and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiffs bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action on a note given in part payment for a Randolph header machine sold by plaintiffs in error to defendant in error, and was tried in the district court on appeal from a justice of the peace. The action was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant. *95The defense was, that the machine was not reasonably fit for the work for which it was purchased, and upon discovery of the fact was, within a reasonable time, returned by the defendant to the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiffs in error challenge the whole…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Lukens v. FreiundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Dearden v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Haynes v. Plano Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API