Legal Opinion
ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 2001No. E027841PublishedCited by 223 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Defendants appeal the denial of their motion, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16), to strike the complaint of ComputerXpress, Inc. (ComputerXpress) as a “SLAPP” suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation). The trial court determined that none of ComputerXpress’s claims was subject to section 425.16. Therefore, it did not require ComputerXpress to establish a probability of prevailing on its claims.
We agree that some of ComputerXpress’s claims were not subject to section 425.16 and affirm the denial of the motion to strike those…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by223 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Netbula, LLC v. Distinct Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.