Netbula, LLC v. Distinct Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND
LARSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend its Counterclaim (Document # 15 in the court’s docket) came on for hearing on January 8, 2003, Neil A. Smith, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, appeared for plaintiff Netbula, LLC (“Netbu-la”). Kimberly A. Eckhart, Morrison & Foerster, appeared for defendant Distinct Corporation (“Distinct”). The court considered the moving and opposing papers and the arguments of counsel and granted the motion from the bench. The court herein presents the reasoning behind its ruling.
Distinc…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Marilyn Miller v. Rykoff-Sexton, Inc., and Atlas Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by165 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Clarke v. UptonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Labrador v. Seattle Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- (PC) Cortinas v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.