Cromwell Commons Associates v. Koziura
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The defendants appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to open and vacate the judgment rendered. This matter previously came before this court in Cromwell Commons Associates v. Koziura, 17 Conn. App. 13, 549 A.2d 677 (1988). At that time, the case was remanded to the trial court for “an evidentiary hearing to determine whether any of the restrictions set out in [Varley v. Varley, 180 Conn. 1, 428 A.2d 317 (1980)], barred the defendants from opening the judgment on the basis of fraud.” Id., 17.
The following facts are relevant to the disposition of this appeal.1 The plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Varley v. VarleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Pulaski v. LedwithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Branigan v. CohenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Coles v. ColesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BICC Brand-Rex Co. v. Arthur, Harris & Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Sheikh v. SheikhConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- T.P. Brewer Construction Co. v. F & G AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996