Legal Opinion
Leech v. Rozbicki
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 17, 1989No. 6459PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered for the plaintiff upon a jury verdict. By revised *353complaint, the plaintiff, a real estate agent, claimed that the defendant tortiously interfered with a contractual relationship by inducing the plaintiffs customer, Helen Huybrechts, to breach her contract with the plaintiff.
The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying his motions for a directed verdict, to set aside the verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which were predicated on insufficiency of the evidence, (2) in allowing an amendment of the complaint late in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Hearl v. WATERBURY YMCASupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Wassell v. HamblinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- City of Hartford v. Anderson Fairoaks, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coles v. ColesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Cromwell Commons Associates v. KoziuraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Hughes v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Pietra v. American Factors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Strother v. StrotherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990