Legal Opinion
Manzin v. United Bank & Trust Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 18, 1986No. 3704PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover a real estate brokerage commission from the defendants,1 stemming from the sale of land in New Hartford. From the judgment rendered in favor of the *514named defendant, United Bank and Trust Company, the plaintiff has appealed.2
The matter was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts which indicated that the plaintiff, Larry Manzin, a licensed realtor in Connecticut, would be entitled to a real estate commission of 10 percent if he succeeded in procuring a buyer, ready, willing and able to purchase the premises owned by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Randolph Construction Co. v. Kings East CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harris Calorific Sales Co. v. Manifold Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Maluszewski v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Spicer v. SpicerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Coles v. ColesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.