Legal Opinion
Mannion v. Baldwin
California Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 11929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in this case in order to consider more fully the issues therein involved. Upon such consideration, we are satisfied that the opinion of. Mr. Justice pro tern. Tuttle correctly decides said issues, and we therefore adopt said opinion as the opinion of this court. It reads as follows:
“This is an action brought to recover the sum of $7,500 which it is contended was paid for stock issued and sold in violation of a permit granted under the Corporate Securities Act. The trial court found to the contrary, and judgment was entered in favor of defendants. The appeal is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- O'Connell v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Auslen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Blank v. Olcovich Shoe Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Columbia Engineering Co. v. JoinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Gillis v. Pan American Western Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.