Legal Opinion

People v. Pace

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1925No. Docket No. 1202PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

The defendant in this case was accused by the district attorney of the crime of violating the Corporate Securities Act, committed as follows:

“That the said S. A. Pace on or about the 28th day of November, 1923, at, and in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously engage, either wholly or in part, in the business of selling, offering for sale, negotiating for the sale of, and otherwise dealing in securities and securities issued by others, and of underwriting issue of securities and of purchasing such securities with the purpose…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re PeppersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API