Legal Opinion
Tatterson v. Kehrlein
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1927No. Docket No. 6040PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
On November 4, 1916, “The Franklin Amusement Corporation” was incorporated under the laws of the state of California, and two years later certain issued stock was purchased by appellants. On September 28, 1923, the agreement, which is the foundation of this litigation, was entered into between appellants and respondents.
The agreement is very lengthy and need not be set out in Jiaec verba. We summarize it, setting forth merely such portions as are necessary to an' understanding of the questions involved in this appeal:
Preamble: “This memorandum of agreement made and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Eberhard v. Pacific Southwest Loan & Mortgage Corp.California Supreme Court · 1932
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.