O'Connell v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
A petition for rehearing herein was granted because we entertained some doubt concerning the correctness of the opinion heretofore filed, but upon further consideration we have concluded that the original opinion was correct, and it is now adopted as the opinion herein, as follows:
Certain real property in Los Angeles County held under lease by the appellant corporation, of which the individual appellants were directors, was acquired by them for the drilling of an oil-well. The respondents purchased certificates representing interests known as overriding royalties therein. The well was not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Terry v. HumphreysNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- Donovan v. PurtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Mayes v. Sturdy Northern Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.