Legal Opinion

Blank v. Olcovich Shoe Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1937No. Civ. 11069; Civ. 11095PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

This action for money had and received is

predicated upon the proposition that 746 shares of the common stock of The Olcovich Shoe Company, of the value of $7,460, had been sold to plaintiffs without a permit having been obtained therefor by said The Olcovich Shoe Company, and that 254 shares of the common stock (of the same company) of the value of $2,540, had been sold by said corporation to plaintiffs for said sum in violation of certain terms of the permit of the commissioner of corporations.

It appears from the record that Emil Olcovich was the founder of the corporation bearing his name,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Mannion v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Thomson v. L. C. Roney & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Cleveland v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. McClellan v. Northridge Park Townhome Owners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API