Gillis v. Pan American Western Petroleum Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendant corporation and its directors to recover from them the amounts paid by them for capital stock of the corporation, it being alleged that no permit had been issued authorizing issuance of stock in California. Demurrers to the complaint and amended complaint having been sustained, with leave to amend, plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint, to which the individual defendants interposed a demurrer, which was sustained without leave to amend. This appeal is from the judgment of dismissal in favor of the demurring defendants…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Edward v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- McFarland v. HolcombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Auslen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Oakley v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. SobieskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.