Legal Opinion
Kuhn v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 22, 1985No. 83-01668; CA A33124PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Claimant petitions for review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed SAIF’s denial of her aggravation claim. ORS 656.273. The issue is whether she met her burden of proving her aggravation claim. On de novo review, ORS 656.298, we conclude that she did. We reverse and reinstate the referee’s order.
Claimant compensably injured her low back in March, 1981. During the course of treatment, it was determined that she had a congenital condition described as a pronounced lumbar lordosis and prominently curved sacrum. She was diagnosed as having a lumbosacral strain superimposed on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garbutt v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Hamlin v. Roseburg Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Hoke v. Libby, McNeil & LibbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Price v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Sedgwick Claims Management Services v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Queener v. United Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Americold Corp. v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Brown v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985