Legal Opinion

Garbutt v. SAIF Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1984No. WCB 80-11364; SAIF D 4992; CA A27709; SC S30281PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*150JONES, J.

The claimant petitioned for judicial review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order awarding him 30 percent permanent partial unscheduled disability for injury to his left shoulder. The Board’s order reduced the referee’s award of permanent total disability. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion.

After reviewing the very complicated medical history of the claimant, the Board stated in its order: “The medical evidence does not support any conclusion other than that claimant has suffered a very minor impairment to his left shoulder” and that “[w]e do not believe that it is an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larson v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Collins v. States Veneer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. Oakley v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hoke v. Libby, McNeil & LibbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Kassahn v. Publishers Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Kuhn v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. McElmurry v. Roseburg School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API