Legal Opinion

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 1984No. 81-02535; CA A29392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The issue is whether SAIF is foreclosed from denying claimant medical services under ORS 656.245(1). The medical evidence is that claimant’s knee condition, which was repaired by surgery, preexisted and was not caused by the compensable injury. The referee, affirmed by the Board, determined that the issue had “been adjudicated” and that SAIF had been found to be responsible by that adjudication. Accordingly, SAIF’s denial was set aside, and it appeals. We affirm.

In 1973, claimant injured his left knee in a nonindustrial motorcycle accident. In 1976, he injured the same knee on the job. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Francoeur v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. McGarry v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Poole v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Aldrich v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Olson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API