Legal Opinion

Americold Corp. v. Hoyt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 2006No. 03-04467; A127293Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) setting aside its denial of claimant’s aggravation claim. We review the board’s legal conclusions for errors of law including for substantial reason, ORS 183.482(8)(a), and its findings for substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(c). Because we conclude that the board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and substantial reason, we affirm.

In 1991, claimant injured his lower back and filed a workers’ compensation claim. The employer’s workers’ compensation insurer at the time, AIG Claim Services Inc. (AIG),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kuhn v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API