Legal Opinion
County of Merced v. Shaffer
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1919No. Civ. No. 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
In the month of February, 1916, 0. Dinelli and Francis Francisco were arrested upon a burglary charge in Merced County. They were committed by the justice of the peace to the custody of the sheriff and their bail fixed at five hundred dollars each. After setting out these facts, the third amended complaint alleges further: “Said H. S. Shaffer and said J. J. Griffin and each of them for the purpose of re-> leasing the said 0. Dinelli and the said Francis Francisco from actual custody upon said charge, and in order that said 0. Dinelli .and the said Francis Francisco might be released…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of San Luis Obispo v. RyalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Malheur County v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- City & County of San Francisco v. HartnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- United States v. SuretiesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1871
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kiperman v. KlenshetynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Strauss v. BruceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.