City & County of San Francisco v. Hartnett
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. L. F. Byington, District Attorney, and I. Harris, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants entered after failure of plaintiff to amend complaint upon order sustaining defendants’ general demurrer to the complaint.
The action was brought against defendants as the sureties on a bail-bond given by them to secure the appearance of one Calnan, to answer to the charge of grand larceny in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco.
Respondent, the demurring party in the trial court, urges that the bond sued on is void for the reason (among others also urged) that, as appears by the allegations of the complaint, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Murdock v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Moffat v. GreenwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Carpenter v. FurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Dennard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
- Benedict v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Merced v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Taylor v. ExniciousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. CarreroDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1955
- State v. BowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.