Legal Opinion

People v. Page

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1929No. Docket No. 6631PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

On a complaint charging that the defendant had committed a felony, the police court made an order holding him to answer before the Superior Court. An order was made admitting him to bail “in the sum of one thousand dollars by bond or by the deposit of five hundred dollars in coin.” On May 5, 1927, the defendant furnished a bond executed by the National Surety Company in words and figures as follows: “An order holding to answer having been filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the City and County of San Francisco, on the 6th day of May, A. D. 1927, by the judge of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. HodgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Marshall v. WentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Montecito County Water District v. DoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. County of San Luis Obispo v. RyalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. People v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. New York Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. DeletorreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Morris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. People v. New York Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API