Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Bruce
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 1, 1934No. Civ. No. 8963; Civ. No. 8964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Walter C. Hartman, one of the defendants above named, in the year 1928 executed to Louis S. Strauss and Edgar L. Strauss, copartners doing business as Strauss Brothers, six promissory notes. Five of the notes contained a provision for the payment of the principal “with interest payable monthly at the rate of one (1) per cent per month from date until paid . . . should the interest not be paid when due it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, and at the option of the holder of this note the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable”.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zartman v. First Nat. Bank of WaterlooSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Norris v. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McIntosh v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Beach Associates, Inc. v. FauserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- First American Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Tomas v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.