Legal Opinion
Kiperman v. Klenshetyn
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 2005No. B177189PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
This is an appeal by a bail bond agent, Richard David Kiperman, from an order directing the return of bail bond premiums in the amount of $17,000. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in (1) ordering relief from liability and return of the premium paid on the first bail bond, and (2) ordering return of the premium paid on the second bail bond when good cause for surrender was shown. We agree and reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
In December of 2003, defendant Erik Arnold Klenshetyn was charged in a complaint with making terrorist threats, being a felon in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- People v. McReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Merced v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. International Fidelity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Lexington National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Lexington National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Accredited Surety & CasualtyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. American Surety CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.