Legal Opinion

County of San Luis Obispo v. Ryal

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1917No. L. A. No. 3811PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action was brought to recover from defendants the sum of two thousand dollars for which it is alleged they are liable upon an undertaking in that amount executed by them as sureties in a criminal action and which was declared forfeited by the superior court of San Luis Obispo County for breach of its conditions. These are all the allegations in the complaint respecting said undertaking, save that it is annexed to the complaint as a part thereof.

The undertaking sued on is a bond on appeal. It is entitled People of the State, etc., Plaintiff, v. Teofil Klempke, Defendant, and recites and…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Estate of O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Yellen v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. County of Merced v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API