Legal Opinion
Sunlite Mfg. Co. v. Clarvan Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided October 14, 1947No. Civ. No. 3836PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit. Plaintiff is the owner of Smith, et al. Patent No. 2,214,824 for “ironing pad,” issued September 17, 1940, based on an application filed on March 2, 1939. All four claims of the patent are in issue. The defense is invalidity and non-infringement.
The patent in suit is directed to an ironing pad characterized as including a resilient pad, and a cover associated therewith, which is constructed for the purpose of maintaining the pad in a dry condition during extended ironing operations and to provide for the reflection of heat from the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holland Co. v. American Steel FoundriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Helbush v. FinkleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948