Legal Opinion

Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 3, 1941No. 9; No. 10; No. 11PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ordered that the opinion in these eases be amended as follows:

1. Strike from the second complete paragraph, page 2, lines 5 and 6, the phrases “one of several claims” and “which the Court sustained”.

2. In line 18 of the same paragraph substitute the word “one” for the word “another”.

3. In the fourth line from the bottom of page 3 insert the words “without prejudice” before the word “of”.

4. Modify the third, fourth, and fifth lines from the bottom of the first complete paragraph on page 9 to read: “found the elements of the invention which it described but in which, absent the flexible web…

2Cited by43 opinions

  1. Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. Gustav H. Bobertz, Jr. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Bryan W. Nickerson, Jr. v. The Bearfoot Sole Company, Inc., the Bearfoot Airway Corporation,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. Consolidated Expanded Metal CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API