Legal Opinion
Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 7, 1945No. 463PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
This is an action containing three counts and based on the Anti-Trust Laws, 1 the Patent Laws 2 and the Declaratory Judgment Act. 3 Defendant filed a consolidated motion to strike portions of the complaint, to dismiss the three counts, or for summary judgment as to counts 1 and 2. 4
Count 1. Plaintiffs allege the parties manufacture rotary bits for drilling oil wells. Defendant in 1933 sued plaintiff, Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company of Massachusetts, 5 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma for selling bits manufactured by Chicago…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Nolan v. Judicial Council of Third CircuitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.