Legal Opinion

Holland Co. v. American Steel Foundries

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 3, 1951No. 10321PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

In the District Court, plaintiff charged defendant with infringement of Claim 10 of the patent to Goodwin 2,053,989, issued September 8, 1936. Defendant asserted invalidity and noninfringement. The District Court found that defendant had not infringed and, believing it unnecessary, therefore, to pass upon the defense of invalidity, declined to consider the latter and, though expressing doubt as to validity, made no findings or conclusions as to novelty, utility or patentable invention, essentials of validity. Consequently, the only issue within the scope of the review…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Kelley v. Everglades Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Aero Spark Plug Co. v. BG CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Irvin v. Buick Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Powder Power Tool Corporation v. Powder Actuated Tool Company, Inc., and Frank J. KlunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Sperry Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Aluminum Company Of America v. Sperry Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. Johnson & Johnson v. Carolina Lee Knitting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Sperry Products, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API