Legal Opinion
Jones v. Holt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-1086PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
David Earl Jones, a prisoner who was convicted of first degree murder and other crimes in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his imprisonment under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Jones also moved for an evidentiary hearing, a request that the Court denied upon concluding that he was barred from obtaining a such a hearing by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2). See Memorandum Opinion, Jones v. Holt (Sept. 30, 2011), 814 F.Supp.2d 4 [Dkt. No. 9]. Presently before the Court is a motion by Mr. Jones…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Earle v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Earle v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Pinkney v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Rogers v. IvesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Roseboro v. RickardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023