Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Ives

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0511Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY MEMORANDUM AND OPINION; NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTERS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEITH ROGERS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0511 (RLW) ) ) RICHARD IVES, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION1 In this action for a writ of habeas corpus brought pro se, petitioner claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on direct appeal from his conviction in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.”) at 3-6 [Dkt. # 1]. The United States moves to dismiss the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Beard v. KindlerSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Walker v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Jones v. HoltDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API