Legal Opinion

Earle v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-0797Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) VERNON NORMAN EARLE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-0797 (PLF) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) _______________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States moves to dismiss this action for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely filed. See United States’ Motion to Dismiss Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Resp’t’s Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 26]. Mr. Earle opposes the motion. See Objection to Government Motion to Treat Petitioner’s Habeas Corpus…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Premo v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API