Legal Opinion
Earle v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-0797 (PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The United States moves to dismiss this action for a writ of habeas corpus as untimely filed. See United States’ Motion to Dismiss Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Resp’t’s Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 26]. Mr. Earle opposes the motion. See Objection to Government Motion to Treat Petitioner’s Habeas Corpus Filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, as Filed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and for Summary Dismissal as Untimely Filed (“Pet’r’s Opp’n”) [Dkt. No. 29]. Upon consideration *9of the parties’ submissions and the entire record, the Court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bailey v. EbbertDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Dyer-El v. The United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Dyer-El v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Graham v. FCC Coleman Usp IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.