State v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of unlawful possession ofmethamphetamine, ORS 475.894, and felon in possession of a restricted weapon, ORS 166.270(2). On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.
We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress for legal error, and state the facts consistently with the trial court’s express and implied findings. See State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 10, 115 P3d 908 (2005) (a reviewing court is bound by the trial court’s factual findings if there is supporting evidence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RudderOregon Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. NyeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017