State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for interfering with a peace officer. A person commits the offense of interfering with a peace officer, when, “knowing that another person is a peace officer,” he or she “[r]efuses to obey a lawful order by the peace officer ***.” ORS 162.247(l)(b). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal. He argues that the state failed to present sufficient evidence that the deputy’s order to exit his vehicle was lawful. The state argues that the order was justified by the officer safety doctrine.
When we review…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MiglavsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. AusmusOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BybeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KreisOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. BlackstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. KreisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. CastimoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.