Legal Opinion

State v. Rudder

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2009No. CC 05CR0568; CA A129931; SC S056443PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this criminal case, the Court of Appeals overturned defendant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance on the ground that a police officer’s search of defendant’s pants pocket was unlawful and that evidence obtained in that search — the controlled substance — therefore should have been suppressed. The state sought review, arguing that the search, which involved looking into defendant’s pocket after he was stopped on suspicion of involvement in a residential burglary, was permissible under the “officer safety” doctrine described in State v. Bates, 304 Or 519, 747 P2d 991…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. MaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API