State v. Rudder
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In this criminal case, the Court of Appeals overturned defendant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance on the ground that a police officer’s search of defendant’s pants pocket was unlawful and that evidence obtained in that search — the controlled substance — therefore should have been suppressed. The state sought review, arguing that the search, which involved looking into defendant’s pocket after he was stopped on suspicion of involvement in a residential burglary, was permissible under the “officer safety” doctrine described in State v. Bates, 304 Or 519, 747 P2d 991…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. MaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.