Legal Opinion

State v. Nye

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 2019No. A162779PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, J. pro tempore.

*560Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of methamphetamine, ORS 475.894. In a single assignment of error, defendant challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a traffic stop, arguing, among other things, that the officer's patdown of defendant that led to the discovery of the evidence was unlawful. For the reasons explained below, we agree with defendant and reverse.

We review a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress for legal error and are bound by the trial court's findings if they are supported by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. Rodriguez-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. RudderOregon Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. DacquistoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. DacquistoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API