Legal Opinion

South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Mooneyham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 6, 1991No. 23395PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Respondent South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) filed this declaratory judgment action to determine the amount of underinsured motorist benefits it was obligated to pay under three policies issued to the insured, appellant Cynthia M. Mooneyham. Mooneyham claimed that she was entitled to stack the underinsured motorist coverage provided in the policies. The trial judge held that Mooneyham could not stack the underinsured coverage because the policy covering the car involved in the accident provided excess underinsured coverage. We reverse.

DISCUSSION

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Garris v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. RhodenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. American Security Insurance v. HowardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Kay v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API