Legal Opinion
Garris v. Cincinnati Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 17, 1984No. 22028PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gregory, Justice:
Under the provisions of Rule 46 of the Rules of Practice of the South Carolina Supreme Court, the following questions have been certified to this Court by the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina:
1. What is the definition of underinusred motorists coverage as used in § 56-9-831 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976)?
2. Does § 56-9-831 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976) require that “basic limits” of underinsured motorist coverage of $15,000/30,000/5,000 be offered to all automobile policy holders as well as underinsured motorist…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Ferguson Ex Rel. Estate of Ferguson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Davidson v. Eastern Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
3Cited by43 opinions
- State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Hanover Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.