Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Rhoden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 13, 2012No. 27131PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

Petitioner, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), contends that the court of appeals erred in ruling that Respondents Kelly Rhoden and Emerlynn Dickey are entitled to underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage under Kelly Rho-den’s policy covering two “at-home” vehicles. We affirm based on South Carolina’s well-settled public policy that UIM coverage is personal and portable.

Facts/ Procedural Background

Respondents Kelly Rhoden (Rhoden) and her daughters, Ashley Arrieta (Arrieta) and Emerlynn Dickey (Dickey), were involved in a motor vehicle accident while riding in a vehicle owned and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Hogan v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Citizens' Bank v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brock v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Carter v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. DomainsNewMedia.com, LLC v. Hilton Head Island-Bluffton Chamber CommerceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  4. Precision Walls, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Canal Insurance v. National House Movers, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API