Legal Opinion

Woodside School District No. 8 v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The facts are not in dispute. They are as follows : The respondent McCartan was employed by the appellant school district as janitor for the school year 1939-1940. His duties were to build fires, sweep, and wash the floors. At times his children helped perform the services. It was only a part-time job, for which he was paid $33 per month. On April 1, 1940, while tending the furnace something flew out of the furnace and struck him in the right eye. He received medical attention the next day. A hypopyon ulcer developed and enucleation became advisable and was performed on May 9, 1940. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Nestle's Food Co. v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Huebner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Northern Hotel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Enderby v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hume v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Christnovich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Plencner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API